“Maybe life is random, but I doubt it.”
There’s a news radio station in Fort Worth that has almost all of its daytime weekend programming related to money, investing, and personal finance. It’s almost like the programming folks at CNBC decided to take over this radio station on the weekend, because, unless the Texas Longhorns are playing, you can tune in to this station and listen to money advice to your heart’s content.
I imagine that if someone listens to those shows long enough, he’ll become convinced that he knows more than the average Joe and can go into the markets and actively trade and make a mint.
But, just like fans of all sports teams except the champion, there’s a rallying cry: “Wait until next year!”
So, 2013 has now come and gone. The S&P 500 performed markedly better, gaining 29.6%, compared to 2012’s 11.7% gain.
Surely, given the improvement in the performance of the index, it was a better year to pick individual stocks.
2013 Performance of the S&P 500’s Stock Components by the Numbers
To compare the performance of the components, I took the 481 stocks which remained in the index throughout all of 2013, eliminating either new entrants or spinoffs. I then looked at the opening prices on January 2, 2013 and the closing prices on December 31, 2013 to see how well each stock performed over the past year. If the performance was better than the 29.6% average, then it was a winner. If not, it was a loser.
In total, 233 stocks outperformed the average, or 48.44% of the components exceeded the 29.6% gain in 2013.
If you picked a winning stock, you probably got a return between 30% and 70%, and even if you picked a “losing” stock, you still turned in a gain, as only 51 stocks showed a loss on the year.
4 stocks lost more than 30%, while 17 stocks gained more than 90%.
Let’s look at the David Letterman Top 10 and the Bob Uecker Bottom 10 stocks for 2013.
The top 10 S&P 500 stocks for 2013
The bottom 10 S&P 500 stocks for 2013
Even though 2013 was a better year for the random stock pickers – a 48.44% chance of being right in 2013 versus a 45.86% chance in 2012 – it still wasn’t as good as simply investing in the index and letting the money ride.
Throw a dart for 6 years with a 48.44% chance of hitting a winner each year, and you’ll have a 1.3% chance of being a winner all six years.
Those aren’t odds I like.
Still tempted to invest in individual stocks? Let’s talk about it in the comments below!